TMS LeftTri Image Resources PURPLE v2
Four diverse professionals—two women and two men—gather around a laptop in a modern office with exposed brick walls. All appear focused and engaged, suggesting a collaborative work session or team discussion.

Leading Through Change

Change is an inescapable feature of organizational life and a defining factor in employee engagement. For new managers, navigating it effectively requires more than just tactical execution – it demands the capacity to interpret and respond to the diverse ways in which people experience uncertainty. While some team members exhibit enthusiasm for the unknown, others respond with caution or quiet disengagement.

Effective change leadership, therefore, begins with a fundamental question:

Do you know how your team responds to risk and change?

The Risk Orientation Model provides a research-based framework that helps managers understand how individuals approach challenge, possibility, and transition. As part of the Team Management Systems (TMS) complete system for team effectiveness, it enables a more tailored, empathetic, and ultimately productive leadership response.

Why Teams Experience Change Differently

Team members do not respond to change in uniform ways. Some are energized by novelty and future potential; others are inclined to focus on what might go wrong. Both perspectives are valid, and both contribute to a team’s overall resilience.

The challenge for leaders lies in making these differences visible and actionable. Absent that insight, managers risk misinterpreting caution as resistance, or momentum as recklessness. This can lead to frustration and poor alignment. The QO2 Profile allows managers to decode the underlying mindset of each individual and, in doing so, lead with greater accuracy and trust.

QO2 for Risk and Change Orientation

QO2 is not a personality profile, nor is it a vague attitude check. It is an evidence-based psychometric profile that captures how individuals orient themselves toward opportunity and obstacles. It is especially useful during periods of change or transformation.

The tool evaluates five sub-scales:

  • MTG Energy: The intensity of a person’s drive to pursue and complete objectives.

  • Multi-Pathways Thinking: The ability to identify alternative routes when encountering challenges.

  • Optimism: A general disposition toward expecting positive outcomes.

  • Fault-Finding: The degree to which risks and problems are anticipated or scrutinized.

  • Time Focus: Whether someone’s temporal orientation is grounded in the past, present, or future.

These variables culminate in a QO2 score, which locates each individual along a spectrum from opportunity-focused to obstacle-focused. Neither orientation is inherently preferable. In fact, teams benefit from having a balance of both.

Managerial Implications by Profile Type

Once QO2 data is available, managers can differentiate their leadership approach to better support individuals. The following table outlines common profiles and their implications:

Profile Type Contributions to the Team Supportive Leadership Responses
Opportunity-Focused Energy, vision, and speed Introduce friction-reducing structure and reflective pause
Obstacle-Focused Risk mitigation, realism, and detail Provide early inclusion and opportunities for influence
Balanced (QO2 1.6–3.0) Flexibility, pragmatism, integration Position as a bridge between extremes

Coaching Deeper with the Subscales

Beyond the overall QO2 score, each sub-scale offers a developmental lever:

  • MTG Energy: Introduce ‘stretch goals’ and reinforce persistence through short wins.

  • Multi-Pathways Thinking: Run obstacle-mapping sessions where teams brainstorm alternative ways forward.

  • Optimism: Reflect on the “3P's” (Personal, Permanent, Pervasive) from Seligman’s work on learned optimism.

  • Fault-Finding: Encourage structured “Potential Obstacles Analysis” to make critique constructive.

  • Time Focus: Use timeline reflection exercises to balance short-term pragmatism with longer-term visioning.

These sub-scales give managers a practical way to coach individuals, frame feedback, and create growth paths that align with their natural risk orientation.

Three Practical Interventions for Change-Readiness

The transition from insight to action is where many tools fall short. QO2, however, is part of a broader system that supports behavioral follow-through. Managers looking to build change-readiness can begin with the following interventions:

1. Conduct a QO2 Assessment

This provides a baseline understanding of team attitudes toward risk, offering visibility into invisible dynamics. Go beyond individual feedback—use the group profile to identify collective tendencies. Is the team over-indexing on optimism? Are potential blockers being under-acknowledged?

2. Normalize Diverse Reactions to Change

Use the language of opportunity and obstacle to de-stigmatize caution and avoid over-celebrating untested optimism. The “Missed Opportunities” group activity, from TMS’s facilitation toolkit, helps surface your team’s risk posture and create space for all voices.

3. Anchor Change in Shared Values

When change challenges identity, the Window on Work Values (WoWV) Profile helps uncover the values underpinning people’s motivations. Facilitators can use this to build bridges between the strategic why and the personal why, especially for team members who feel left out of the change narrative.

The Manager’s Evolving Role

The most effective change leaders do not coerce; they interpret. They translate strategic priorities into human terms, helping individuals understand the “why” and engage in the “how.” When team members feel recognised and equipped, change becomes an adaptive process rather than a destabilising event.

Use the QO2 Profile as a common language system. Instead of saying:

“We need to be more agile,”

ask:

“What opportunities do we see? What obstacles might we encounter? What energy will get us there?”

This reframing doesn’t just shift the tone, it redistributes ownership.

Facilitation Tip: Running a QO2 Debrief

If you’re leading a team session using QO2 results, try these three techniques:

  • Visualise the Range: Share your team’s QO2 distribution using norm comparison charts – this grounds the insights in reality.

  • Pair Differently: Match highly opportunity-focused individuals with those more obstacle-aware. Ask each to share their perspective on a recent change initiative.

  • Explore the Spread: A large gap between opportunity and obstacle scores may indicate inner tension. Use this as a coaching conversation starter about decision fatigue or clarity of direction.

Insight-Driven Change Begins Here

Change-readiness is not a soft skill, it is a measurable capability that can be developed over time. When leaders begin with insight and follow through with action, they earn the trust and engagement required to lead well.

The QO2 Profile offers that insight. It equips managers to lead change not as a top-down directive, but as a shared learning process.

To explore how the QO2 Profile can support your leadership goals, reach out to our team today. Create clarity. Build commitment. Lead what’s next.